{"id":63517,"date":"2026-07-09T03:00:15","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T01:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/"},"modified":"2026-07-09T03:00:15","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T01:00:15","slug":"the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/","title":{"rendered":"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

A little more than a month into a hostile homebuilder takeover saga that has not quite reached midsummer, Dream Finders Homes<\/strong>\u2019 pursuit of \u0414\u043e\u043c\u0430 \u0411\u0438\u0437\u0435\u0440\u0430<\/strong> is beginning to resemble a Shakespearean tale of unrequited love.<\/p>\n

The ardent suitor has returned again. And again. The latest offering<\/a> is richer: $32 per share in cash, up 24% from the $25.75 proposal Dream Finders made public in May<\/a> and, by the bidder\u2019s calculation, 70% above Beazer\u2019s undisturbed May 8 share price.<\/p>\n

The object of its affection still will not agree to a meeting.<\/p>\n

Not, at least, without conditions.<\/p>\n

Beazer\u2019s July 8 \u043e\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0442<\/a> to Dream Finders\u2019 latest proposal reveals a contest that has become more complicated than a bidder repeatedly raising its price and a target repeatedly saying no.<\/p>\n

In fact, Beazer did not reject the $32 offer outright.<\/p>\n

Instead, the Atlanta-based builder said it had received interest from \u201cadditional parties regarding a range of potential transactions\u201d and was evaluating those possibilities against its standalone strategy. It also disclosed that it had previously given Dream Finders three conditions for opening discussions: raise the price, drop a demand for exclusive negotiations, and sign a customary confidentiality and standstill agreement.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders met the first two conditions. The third condition has now become the fault line.<\/p>\n

Late Wednesday, after this analysis was initially published, Dream Finders sharpened exactly where that fault line lies.<\/p>\n

The Jacksonville-based builder said it \u201chas already offered and remains prepared to execute an NDA immediately\u201d and would accept a limited standstill to allow due diligence to proceed. What it will not accept is a 12-month restriction that would prevent it from returning to direct engagement with Beazer shareholders or nominating directors for election at Beazer\u2019s 2027 annual meeting.<\/p>\n

That clarification narrows the disagreement considerably.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders is not refusing confidentiality. Nor is it rejecting the concept of a standstill. The dispute is over how long the restriction lasts and what options remain available to the bidder if due diligence concludes without a negotiated transaction.<\/p>\n

In other words, the issue is no longer whether Dream Finders will accept rules of engagement.<\/p>\n

It is who retains leverage if engagement fails.<\/p>\n

What that means is that the next phase of this contest turns on something other than whether Dream Finders will keep bidding against itself. At $32, the pressure now runs in both directions.<\/p>\n

Beazer\u2019s board faces a higher burden to demonstrate that remaining independent \u2014 or pursuing one of the other alternatives it says it is considering \u2014 offers shareholders greater prospective value than cash in hand.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders, meanwhile, faces a question that grows more pressing with each increase in its offer: What, precisely, can it do with Beazer that Beazer cannot do for itself, and will those improvements justify what Dream Finders is now prepared to pay?<\/p>\n

Those are the questions that will shape what comes next [and we\u2019ll take them up in a Part 2 installment on this analysis tomorrow]<\/em>. <\/p>\n

First, however, the two companies have to get into the same room.<\/p>\n

Five offers, but a more helpful approach<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Dream Finders\u2019 latest public presentation fills in a bidding chronology that stretches back five months.<\/p>\n

In early February, Dream Finders privately proposed paying $28.50 per share in cash. It raised that proposal to $29 in March. On May 5, it submitted the $25.75 proposal that became public six days later and turned a private courtship into a hostile pursuit.<\/p>\n

That $25.75 figure has served as the public benchmark ever since. But it may not be the most useful number for understanding how the negotiation has evolved.<\/p>\n

Longtime homebuilding equity analyst Dan Oppenheim regards the earlier $29 private proposal as the more relevant reference point. Seen from that perspective, Dream Finders\u2019 June 22 move to $29.25 carried a message beyond the extra quarter per share.<\/p>\n

With that communication, Dream Finders signaled it was prepared to move.<\/p>\n

The offer went above its previous private proposal and, without abandoning the hostile campaign, shifted the tone toward something more constructive:<\/p>\n

We are not simply trying to pressure you with a lower public bid. We are prepared to find a price at which you will engage.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cI think the message from that one was, \u2018We\u2019re not trying to play games here. This is higher than where we were in March. Can we talk about this?\u2019\u201d Oppenheim said.<\/p>\n

That progression may help explain why Beazer\u2019s response changed.<\/p>\n

The company had rejected the earlier approaches. After the $29.25 proposal, it instead told Dream Finders what would be required to begin discussions: a higher price, abandonment of the exclusivity demand, and a confidentiality and standstill agreement.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders then went to $32 and dropped exclusivity.<\/p>\n

The price increase therefore did more than raise the prospective payout to Beazer shareholders. It signaled to investors and directors that Dream Finders was prepared to negotiate upward and put a number on the table that could not as easily be dismissed as a hostile tactic.<\/p>\n

\u201cFrom a process standpoint, it is higher than the $29 offer in March and communicates the message that Dream Finders truly wants to engage to complete a transaction rather than simply pursuing an opportunistic transaction,\u201d Oppenheim said. \u201cAs it relates to the consideration, $32 is close to as high as BZH has traded since coming out of the downturn\/GFC.\u201d<\/p>\n

That places the offer in a different context than Dream Finders\u2019 preferred comparison to Beazer\u2019s $18.77 undisturbed May 8 closing price. The bidder can fairly call $32 a 70% premium to that price.<\/p>\n

Beazer\u2019s board must also contend with another fact: Investors in the public market have valued the company more highly for only brief periods over the past 15 years.<\/p>\n

The $32 offer, Oppenheim said, is now \u201cmore helpful, more productive,\u201d and steps up the pressure on Beazer. The company can still decide that another transaction or its standalone strategy offers shareholders more value. But the number has become attractive enough that an outright rejection requires a more substantive case.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis may be viewed as more compelling by investors as it is 1) a 10% premium to the $29 offer in March, 2) a 16.7% premium to yesterday\u2019s closing price, and 3) nearly as high as Beazer has traded in over 15 years,\u201d Oppenheim said. \u201cWhile $32 per share would still be approximately 25% below Beazer\u2019s book value as of March 31st, other recent transactions<\/a> \u2014 Landsea et al \u2014 have shown that managements and boards can no longer view book value as a floor in a potential sale transaction.\u201d<\/p>\n

That, in turn, is why the standstill and Beazer\u2019s reference to other alternatives now matter so much.<\/p>\n

The standstill is more than a trifling matter<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The immediate obstacle between the companies is no longer the exclusivity requirement Dream Finders had previously attached to its proposal. Dream Finders dropped that requirement.<\/p>\n

Nor is it clear that price alone is preventing engagement. Beazer had asked Dream Finders for an improved proposal, and Dream Finders responded with $32.<\/p>\n

What remains is Beazer\u2019s insistence that Dream Finders sign a confidentiality and standstill agreement.<\/p>\n

Standstill agreements are a familiar part of M&A processes. A target company that opens confidential information to a potential buyer commonly seeks restrictions on what that party can do with the information and on the actions it can take while diligence and negotiations proceed.<\/p>\n

The duration matters, however.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders characterizes Beazer\u2019s requested agreement as a 12-month standstill that would prevent it from taking its proposal directly to shareholders if the two sides fail to reach a transaction. A year would also extend the restrictions through Beazer\u2019s next director-nomination cycle.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s more than a minor procedural point in a hostile contest.<\/p>\n

Once a bidder goes public because the target will not engage, outreach to the target\u2019s shareholders becomes a standard part of the campaign. Unlike a friendly transaction negotiated privately between two companies, a hostile bidder seeks, in part, to persuade the target\u2019s owners that its proposal deserves consideration.<\/p>\n

The board sits at the center of that process. Management acts under the board\u2019s authority; directors, in turn, are accountable to shareholders. As the contest unfolds, pressure can shift from shareholders to directors and from directors to management.<\/p>\n

A 12-month standstill would not merely create a quiet period for diligence. Depending on its precise terms, it could prevent Dream Finders from pursuing other avenues to influence Beazer\u2019s governance during the coming cycle, including the possibility of nominating directors.<\/p>\n

Beazer\u2019s public filings set the calendar for shareholder nominations. A 12-month standstill would extend beyond that window, meaning Dream Finders could surrender that option before knowing whether private engagement would produce a transaction.<\/p>\n

When this analysis was initially published, Dream Finders had not publicly said it intended to pursue a director slate. The significance of the 12-month period was that it could eliminate the bidder\u2019s ability to do so.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders\u2019 late-Wednesday response has now made the issue explicit.<\/p>\n

The company said any agreement \u201cmust appropriately preserve Dream Finders\u2019 ability to engage with shareholders or nominate directors for election at Beazer\u2019s 2027 Annual Meeting.\u201d<\/p>\n

That does not mean a proxy contest is inevitable, or even that Dream Finders has decided to pursue one. It does mean the governance implications of the 12-month standstill are no longer merely an inference from Beazer\u2019s nomination calendar.<\/p>\n

Preserving that option is now an acknowledged part of Dream Finders\u2019 negotiating position.<\/p>\n

That disclosure also gives greater weight to Oppenheim\u2019s characterization of Beazer\u2019s position as \u201csavvy.\u201d A 12-month standstill would not simply protect a confidential diligence process. It could carry Dream Finders past a consequential window for applying pressure through Beazer\u2019s governance process.<\/p>\n

Beazer has an obvious interest in controlling a process it now says involves multiple potential alternatives and in preventing any one participant from gaining leverage unavailable to others. Dream Finders has an equally obvious interest in preserving the tools available to a hostile bidder if private engagement leads nowhere.<\/p>\n

That makes the disagreement substantive rather than semantic.<\/p>\n

Beazer says Dream Finders wants to engage \u201cunder unilateral terms.\u201d Dream Finders says Beazer is demanding a restriction that could neutralize its ability to continue the campaign.<\/p>\n

Both descriptions can be true from the perspective of the party making them.<\/p>\n

\u201cAdditional parties\u201d does not equal \u2018white knight\u2019 competing bid<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Another phrase in Beazer\u2019s response deserves equally careful reading. The company said it has \u201creceived interest from additional parties regarding a range of potential transactions.\u201d<\/p>\n

That does come across as news. It is not, however, the same thing as saying Beazer has another offer to buy the company.<\/p>\n

Beazer did not say it has received another whole-company acquisition proposal. It did not say another party has offered more than $32. It did not say any alternative before the board would deliver more immediate cash value to shareholders.<\/p>\n

\u201cAdditional parties\u201d and a \u201crange of potential transactions\u201d can encompass a much broader field.<\/p>\n

Those possibilities could include another strategic buyer. They could also involve a capital investment, a land-banking arrangement, an asset or regional transaction, or another structure that releases capital or changes Beazer\u2019s balance-sheet economics without selling the entire company. The ambiguity in the phrasing leaves the issue open to conjecture as to what and who those \u201cadditional parties\u201d are.<\/p>\n

That does not make Beazer\u2019s disclosure meaningless.<\/p>\n

Its board has publicly notified shareholders that Dream Finders is not the only path under review. Beazer says other parties have signed the confidentiality and standstill agreements that it is asking Dream Finders to accept.<\/p>\n

The distinction is that shareholders do not yet have enough information to compare those alternatives to $32 in cash. That comparison is a burden that falls increasingly on the Beazer board.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders seized directly on that distinction in its late-Wednesday response.<\/p>\n

The bidder called on Beazer\u2019s board to provide greater transparency about the \u201cadditional parties\u201d and, specifically, to clarify whether those expressions of interest are comparable with Dream Finders\u2019 $32-per-share all-cash proposal.<\/p>\n

The challenge matters because it puts a sharper edge on Beazer\u2019s deliberately broad language.<\/p>\n

There is a material difference between another prospective buyer prepared to offer shareholders more than $32 in cash and a potential land-banking, asset, capital or other strategic transaction that might improve Beazer\u2019s standalone economics over time.<\/p>\n

Beazer has said enough to establish that alternatives exist.<\/p>\n

It has not yet said enough for shareholders to determine whether those alternatives are comparable.<\/p>\n

The result is a takeover contest that has entered a new phase.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders has done two of the three things Beazer said it would require for engagement. It raised its price and dropped exclusivity. What remains is a disagreement over a standstill that could materially limit the bidder\u2019s leverage if talks go nowhere.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Beazer has disclosed enough about other interests to make clear that its board is evaluating alternatives \u2014 but not enough for shareholders to know whether any of them offer value comparable to $32 in cash.<\/p>\n

So the not-quite-midsummer saga continues. The suitor has returned with more. The object of its pursuit has not said yes. But this time, it has not quite said no, either.<\/p>\n

What happens next may depend on whether the two companies can agree on the rules for getting into the same room.<\/p>\n

Dream Finders now says it will sign an NDA immediately. It will accept a limited standstill. What it will not do is surrender for 12 months its ability to return to shareholders or seek a voice in Beazer\u2019s boardroom.<\/p>\n

Beazer, meanwhile, says equal treatment of all interested parties requires Dream Finders to accept the same terms others have signed.<\/p>\n

The gap between the companies has narrowed.<\/p>\n

In one important respect, it has also become much clearer.<\/p>\n

The fight is no longer simply over whether the two sides will talk. It is over what Dream Finders must give up for the conversation to begin.<\/p>\n

[Editor\u2019s note]<\/strong> This article has been updated to reflect information shared through a press statement from Dream Finders Homes after our earlier publishing deadline.<\/em><\/p>\n

Tomorrow: At $32, what does Beazer have to prove about its future \u2013 and what does Dream Finders have to prove about its ability to fix what it wants to buy?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A little more than a month into a hostile homebuilder takeover saga that has not quite reached midsummer, Dream Finders Homes\u2019 pursuit of Beazer Homes is beginning to resemble a Shakespearean tale of unrequited love. The ardent suitor has returned again. And again. The latest offering is richer: $32 per share in cash, up 24% […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nThe $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms - Houses Marketplace<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A little more than a month into a hostile homebuilder takeover saga that has not quite reached midsummer, Dream Finders Homes\u2019 pursuit of Beazer Homes is beginning to resemble a Shakespearean tale of unrequited love. The ardent suitor has returned again. And again. The latest offering is richer: $32 per share in cash, up 24% […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Houses Marketplace\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-09T01:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/\",\"name\":\"Houses Marketplace\",\"description\":\"International Real Estate\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/\",\"name\":\"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms - Houses Marketplace\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-09T01:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-09T01:00:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#\/schema\/person\/665c421ad640387074205c0c27f1322d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#\/schema\/person\/665c421ad640387074205c0c27f1322d\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/140237897fb8310eb02b9e9e60bc4c80ec8ee5e10f4896a3c4d6b98a92bf825e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/140237897fb8310eb02b9e9e60bc4c80ec8ee5e10f4896a3c4d6b98a92bf825e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms - Houses Marketplace","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms","og_description":"A little more than a month into a hostile homebuilder takeover saga that has not quite reached midsummer, Dream Finders Homes\u2019 pursuit of Beazer Homes is beginning to resemble a Shakespearean tale of unrequited love. The ardent suitor has returned again. And again. The latest offering is richer: $32 per share in cash, up 24% […]","og_url":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/","og_site_name":"Houses Marketplace","article_published_time":"2026-07-09T01:00:15+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"admin","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"12 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/","name":"Houses Marketplace","description":"International Real Estate","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/","name":"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms - Houses Marketplace","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-09T01:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-09T01:00:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#\/schema\/person\/665c421ad640387074205c0c27f1322d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/the-32-beazer-bid-is-in-now-the-fight-is-over-standstill-terms\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The $32 Beazer bid is in, now the fight is over standstill terms"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#\/schema\/person\/665c421ad640387074205c0c27f1322d","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"ru-RU","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/140237897fb8310eb02b9e9e60bc4c80ec8ee5e10f4896a3c4d6b98a92bf825e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/140237897fb8310eb02b9e9e60bc4c80ec8ee5e10f4896a3c4d6b98a92bf825e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63517\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/housesmarketplace.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}