Another state vs. local jurisdiction showdown is brewing up in Indiana. Lawmakers there are poised to strip cities of much of their power over where and how new housing is built, setting up a clash over who holds the reins of local growth and – critically – housing development.
Indiana’s proposed bill would transform how communities across the state approve housing. If passed, the Statehouse would take charge of key decisions, relegating local planning commissions and councils to a dramatically narrowed purview over neighborhood objections.
The effort reflects a growing pattern of state vs. local showdowns in places such as California, Connecticut, Texas, Colorado and Florida, where state leaders have preempted local zoning to spur new residential construction as a housing affordability strategy.
In those states, governors and elected legislative representatives argue that local resistance to apartments, duplexes, and smaller homes has fueled a severe shortage by stifling new ground-up home development. In response, those state-level officials have passed laws that override city zoning processes.
Local officials, in turn, warn that broad state mandates can backfire by ignoring on-the-ground realities such as aging sewers, school crowding, and neighborhood character, not to mention environmental and central services constraints.
Indiana is now stepping squarely into that debate, testing the lengths state leaders can go to rewrite housing rules in the face of backlash from mayors, county officials and anti-development neighborhood groups.
Why Indiana is addressing affordability
Indianapolis experienced double-digit rent growth during the COVID-19 pandemic, just as Sun Belt states and cities posted eye-popping rent and home price gains.
Supply and construction mark the difference.
During the pandemic boom, Sun Belt metros drew investors and domestic migrants chasing space, warmth, affordability and remote-work flexibility. Builders responded with unprecedented construction, leaving many Southern markets oversupplied once migration slowed.
Indianapolis and the rest of the state held steady. Construction remained relatively flat. A lack of new supply combined with steady demand accelerated home price and rent growth.
Central Indiana avoided the extreme home value spikes that some Sun Belt markets experienced. It has also avoided the price drops those markets saw as demand subsided. Zillow recently placed Indianapolis at the top of its list most buyer-friendly markets. Even so, housing prices have risen faster than wages, creating unmet demand for workforce housing, according to housing advocates and business leaders.
“Indiana, long a bastion of affordability, has experienced a reversal of fortunes” because of a mismatch between supply and demand for affordable housing, Sara Coers, associate director of the Indiana University for Real Estate Studies, wrote in the Indiana Business Review. According to Coers, the middle-income workforce has been the most affected.
That segment is the one that lawmakers seek to address in Indiana and elsewhere.
Indiana Statehouse push to override local rules
The proposed legislation follows a well-trodden path that other states use to encourage more housing supply. House Bill 1001 would declare several types of housing a permitted use “by right,” allowing approval without a public hearing in many residential and commercial zones.
Single-family homes, duplexes, townhomes and accessory dwelling units would be automatically approved in residential districts. Certain mixed-use and multifamily projects could move forward in commercial areas unless a community passes an ordinance to opt out.
The bill also would bar local governments from enforcing many exterior design standards, large minimum lot sizes, tight setback rules and minimum parking mandates unless they carve out exceptions through local ordinances.
Supporters of the state legislative proposal say that those regulations add tens of thousands of dollars to the cost of new homes. They argue those costs have contributed to an estimated shortfall of tens of thousands of newly-developed residences across Indiana.
What local officials say
Local leaders told the House Local Government Committee in a mid-January hearing that the proposal goes too far, stripping away basic best-practice local planning tools and shifting all the risks onto neighborhoods.
“Dictating lower development standards should not be a decision of the state,” Clarksville Town Manager Kevin Baity said.
Baity argued that local officials “are the boots on the ground” and already balance affordability with community character. He warned that limiting parking requirements could clog narrow streets with cars and hinder access for fire trucks and sanitation crews.
“Dictating lower development standards should not be a decision of the state,” he said. Some mayors and planners also raised concerns about losing leverage to secure parks, infrastructure and other public amenities as growth accelerates.
Indianapolis Democrat Rep. Blake Johnson questioned whether the state is trading long-term construction quality for short-term cost savings, saying lawmakers must weigh durability alongside price. Even after committee amendments scaled back some multifamily provisions following public testimony, critics said the HB 1001 bill, as written, still “steamrolls” local control in the name of speed.
Support from business and housing advocates
Business groups and housing advocates countered that the bill is an overdue response to a housing shortage that constrains Indiana’s labor market.
Camille Blunt, vice president of government affairs for the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, told lawmakers that the reforms could lower development costs, increase housing supply and improve predictability for private investment. He called housing policy “workforce policy.”
Gina Leckron, state director for Habitat for Humanity of Indiana, said local regulations have priced many working families out of homeownership and that the state must “start constructing homes for the workforce we currently have.”
Miller has framed HB 1001 as a way to chip away at “unnecessary regulations” and make it easier, faster and cheaper to build entry-level homes and so‑called “missing middle” housing types.
Riding the housing affordability national trend
Indiana’s debate lands amid a broader shift in which state officials have increasingly overridden local zoning to boost housing production, from New England to the Sun Belt. In state after state, that push has scrambled conventional political lines.
Connecticut’s Democratic governor signed into law housing reform that Republicans opposed after he initially vetoed it. Republican-controlled Florida empowered state agencies to push workforce housing over local objections. Leaders in Texas, California and Colorado have followed similar paths. The moves in every case sparked warnings of the loss of home rule.
Miles’s Law, that “where you stand depends on where you sit,” seems to apply frequently to the housing debate. Governors and legislative leaders now frame land-use reform as core economic policy. They argue that housing supply is essential to attracting employers and stabilizing prices.
Indiana’s Republicans are betting that voters worried about housing costs will accept new state power over how homes get built.
English